Saxena et al. 2022. Towards efficient calibration for webcam eye-tracking in online experiments. Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '22) . Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3517031.3529645
Study 2: Characterising the accuracy of webcam eye-tracking
Study 2: Characterising the accuracy of webcam eye-tracking
Study 2: Characterising the accuracy of webcam eye-tracking
Deep learning outperforms present SOTA, but offline inference limits real-time use and privacy.
Study 3: Optimising the speed-accuracy trade-off
Saxena and Fink. 2026. WebSight: Accessible and privacy-aware webcam eye tracking using real-time deep learning in the browser. Manuscript in Preparation
Lessons from eye-tracking in remote settings
Lessons from eye-tracking in remote settings
Calibration sequence (tasks and placement) strongly affects final prediction accuracy
Traditional event-detection and analysis pipelines do not work for 30Hz eye-tracking data
Real-time deep learning inference in the web-browser is still in beta
Web development shifted back to server-side compute with the rise of LLMs
WebGPU and WebONNX suffer from abondoned research and development
WebSight works around it using classic web workers and webGL acceleration!
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Proprietary firmware/software
Logistical challenges when managing a fleet
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Proprietary firmware/software
Logistical challenges when managing a fleet
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Proprietary firmware/software
Logistical challenges when managing a fleet
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Proprietary firmware/software
Logistical challenges when managing a fleet
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Proprietary firmware/software
Logistical challenges when managing a fleet
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Proprietary firmware/software
Logistical challenges when managing a fleet
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910
Lessons from eye-tracking in co-located, social settings
Lessons from eye-tracking in co-located, social settings
Inherent trade-off between non-invasive design vs. experimental control
Manual annotations and synchronisation don't scale
Mobile eye-trackers are mostly built/tested for single-user, self-operation
The cost of maintaining a fleet of eye-tracking hardware quickly adds up
Proprietary softwares and subscriptions make it much worse
Call to researchers, developers, and manufacturers:
Saxena et al. 2026. OpenET: Converging on open standards for hardware-interfacing and data-sharing in eye-tracking. 28th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Montreal, Canada.
Lessons from conducting eye-tracking beyond the lab
Lessons from conducting eye-tracking beyond the lab
Standardization and open-source development is the key
community-contributions have solved similar challenges in other spaces
Wide range of applications: cognitive neuroscience, healthcare, broadcasting, education, etc.
I benefited greatly from interdisciplinary collaboration
Method development requires multiple iterations and continued maintenance
Can take a full PhD and more
Thank you for your attention
Acknowledgements to all contributors, collaborators, and volunteers from
Why take eye tracking beyond the lab?
Study social attention in context
Study cross-modal dynamics with complex, ecological stimuli
Reach global and underrepresented populations
Bridge research and deployment–align methods with real-world systems and industry use cases
Findings from lab based studies often do not replicate in naturalistic/real-world experimentation
Foulsham et al. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.002.
Wohltjen & Wheatley (2024) Interpersonal eye-tracking reveals the dynamics of interacting minds. Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1356680
Laborde et al. (2025) Vision toolkit part 1. Neurophysiological foundations and experimental paradigms in eye-tracking research: a review. Front Physiol. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1571534.
Hoppe et al. (2018) Eye Movements During Everyday Behavior Predict Personality Traits. Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00105
Summary of results
Distributed (bookended) and hybrid calibration outperforms sequential calibration
Gaze prediction accuracy differs across eye-movement and task types
Deep learning reduces calibration and improves reliability over longer trials
Fixation accuracy of ~2.4° from best performing model; surpasses previous state-of-the-art
Prediction accuracy drops at edges and bottom regions of the screen
Appearance-based methods match high-resolution trackers for blink detection
Currently running experiments with real-time deep learning model in web-browsers; to be released as a jsPsych extension
Study 4: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking
Proprietary firmware/software
Logistical challenges when managing a fleet
Synchronising data from multiple sensors and clocks
Synchronising data from multiple egocentric perspectives
Joint attention visualisation and analysis
Saxena et al. 2025. SocialEyes: Scaling Mobile Eye-tracking to Multi-person Social Settings. ACM SIGCHI 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713910